A few years ago I had another weblog where I posted a few unkind words about Ryan Tucker's violent, criminal behavior during his illustrious college career. Someone left a comment that I found so revealing I kept it on a Word Document. Before reading it you'll understand all of its hidden meanings if you familiarize yourself with Ryan Tucker's character and the sort of people who defend violent men.
Here's the post in all its inarticulate glory:
"You are obviously someone who got picked on in school. Who had to form A delusional explantion for it instead of accepting the truth.If you would have had enough confidence in your own character or self confidence in social settings you would never have been bullied, but if u never lovEd yourself how could u expect a group of your teenage peers to do so? And quit personally attacking R.T. He's kind, amazing, gentle, and strong, u do not know him to say such things. He got into a bar fight while a college student, and has paid a huge price for it, many college guys get into fights that end up just as bad, even worse....and the only reason u focus on this one is because of his remarkable career, peace"
My fourth grade teacher would be pulling her hair out after reading that.
Now that you've also had an opportunity to enjoy bad grammar, try to determine how many of the different groups of bully enablers the writer belongs to. For purposes of convenience I'm going to assume that no male American football fan would describe a violent, 300 pound sociopath as "kind, amazing, gentle, and strong." That would just be too damned creepy. I'll be referring to the writer with the pronoun she.
She assumed correctly that I was bullied when I was young. It wasn't overly traumatic, but what I learned from the experience had nothing to do with bullies. I learned that most people, adults included shamelessly display their depraved indifference as if it were something to be proud of. More important, the writer clearly blames bullying on the victim by implying that my lack of "self confidence" justified the behavior of the bullies. That places her clearly in Group 3: Cowards.
The writer refers to Tucker as "kind, amazing, gentle, and strong." One could hardly assemble a more toadying combination of compliments for a violent criminal. This places her in Group 1: Toadying Sycophants and possibly the 3rd category of Group 2: Female Airheads.
She finishes her literary masterpiece by stating that Tucker "got into a bar fight while a college student, and has paid a huge price for it, many college guys get into fights that end up just as bad, even worse....and the only reason u focus on this one is because of his remarkable career, peace" Again she plays the Toadying Sycophant by reminding me of his majesty's "remarkable career." There's nothing remarkable about Tucker's career. He lives inside a huge body and received millions of dollars for knocking other men to the ground in front of thousands of screaming idiots. She clearly implies that beating smaller, weaker victims is perfectly normal behavior for "college guys." She clearly has no empathy for the men who end up being victimized by all those wholesome and manly college guys. This places her firmly in Group 4: Callouses.
America produces a huge number of men who intensely hate women: batterers, serial killers, rapists. The sick bitch who left that comment appears to be oblivious to the hatred she and others like her generate. Consider the case of George Sodini. Many people believe that George Sodini behaved as he did because women rejected him. That's not quite true. He hated women because a very noticeable but small percentage of women who could easily choose whomever they want during their youth inexplicably choose to lavish attention upon the cockiest and most violent sociopaths on campus. Men who end up being abused by those sociopaths tend to notice and George Sodini was obviously one of them. This doesn't seem to occur to the sort of Airhead who left the post in question. Of course...nothing prepares a soulless, social climbing whore to receive the royal penis quite like watching His Majesty brutalize and humiliate a less sponge worthy male, so we can certainly understand her taste in men.
As always...
Why do so many Americans make it so easy for terrorists to hate them? If you have an answer, I'd like to know what it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment